"Disclaimer and Legal Information
The information contained on this website is for educational purposes. While we strive to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
In no event will the National Vaccine Information Center, or any participant, contributor, endorser, or other associate of any kind thereof, be liable for any loss or damage, including, without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever from any activities arising out of or in connection with the use of this website.
--the NVIC website
Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of the National Vaccine Information Center. We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. While we strive to include only those links that will be helpful, the inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorsement of the views expressed within them."
The above is Fisher's disclaimer on her website that all her crap could be wrong and if it is and you followed her advice and something bad happens, it's not her fault. At all. So there.
Apparently, Fisher doesn't like it when reporters and infectious disease experts point out she's wrong, so she's suing Amy Wallace, Paul Offit and Conde Nast Publications.
It's already been covered ably by several blogs, which I'll catalog here, and they do a fine job of detailing the silliness of the suit.
Autism News Beat covers the suit ably and is an excellent place to start your blog journey into the coverage of Fisher getting her panties in a knot over the Wired article. I would imagine by the end of the week, she'll be a bit more knotted at the coverage her action gets.
The filing itself can be found at Ratbags, with the accompanying blog.
Rainbow Chaos also blogs on it, as does Maggie at The Skeptics’ Book of Pooh-Pooh .
Orac at Respectful Insolence covers it, as well. So does Abel Pharmboy. Novella also covers it.
So, there are your pro-science and skeptic blogs covering the attention-diverting lawsuit by Fisher. I am sure more will follow.
But what about those concerned with "vaccine safety" and "greening our vaccines"? Those concerned with making sure people have "full informed consent" (code word for not vaccinating)?
Where are their blogs?
Let me run over to that bastion of pro-safe vaccines (as if those of us who denounce the pseudoscience spewing forth over there are against safe vaccines), Age of Autism. Surely they are covering it? Nope. They're all about the autism numbers, which they've been going on about for months upon months. You'd think their beef would be that the CDC still doesn't acknowledge the numbers they believe to be more accurate rather than arguing the fluffernutter nonsense they go on about.
Okay, what other "pro-safe vaccine activist" can I look at? Ginger's always good for that kind of thing. Nope, she's still stuck on Julie Gerberding's hiring at Merck.
Hmmm. Okay, let's go look at Fisher's site again. Maybe it's in all her video footage? I can't find any reference to the suit, which you would think she'd be all over, right?
I did find them taking blame, though, for the anti-vaccine movement: "The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is a national, non-profit educational organization founded in 1982. The oldest and largest consumer organization advocating the institution of vaccine safety and informed consent protections in the mass vaccination system, NVIC is responsible for launching the vaccine safety and informed consent movement in America in the early 1980's."
There you go, when you want to know where to hang the hat of blame when more children die of vaccine-preventable diseases, you need look no farther than NVIC. Of course, their disclaimer at the top of this blog absolves them from any responsibility. Hey, maybe we should all put those sorts of disclaimers on our sites?
Found another nugget while searching Fisher's site looking for her coverage of her lawsuit:
"The discrimination begins, always, with the majority in a society pointing the finger at a minority for somehow endangering the public health and welfare. Individuals in the minority group are singled out as different - ethnically, biologically, spiritually, morally - from the majority. The human impulse to fear, judge, marginalize or eliminate those different from the rest has left a blood soaked trail winding throughout the entire history of man from the Great Inquisition to the Holocaust; from the killing fields of Cambodia to Rwanda, Serbia and Tibet; while the persecution of those with leprosy, TB, AIDS, mental illness, and handicaps continues in every society".
How can you not stand in awe at a martyr complex so large that she equates her work spreading
If the above quote wasn't enough hyperbole, how about this:
". . . If the State can tag, track down and force citizens against their will to be injected with biologicals of unknown toxicity today, there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the State can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow."
--from Fisher's blog
Fisher would like people to believe that she is unbiased:
"If you want to support unbiased, scientific research into the health effects of vaccination and be part of this historic grassroots movement to defend truth in science and the informed consent principle, become a donor supporter of the consumer-led non-profit (501c3) National Vaccine Information Center. The world’s largest and oldest vaccine safety and informed consent organization is funded by donations from individual citizens and foundations, including Dr. Joseph Mercola and the Albert and Claire Dwoskin Family Foundation. NVIC takes no pharmaceutical industry or government funding."
Oh well, then completely unbiased and totally scientific. You had me at Mercola!
For fun, and because whale.to is a really good place to go, sort of like a clearinghouse of woo, let's look at some of the things Fisher has said that demonstrate how clear-thinking and unbiased, not to mention scientifically-minded she is:
"If everybody is forced to get vaccinated, then there can be no comparison of the long term health of those highly vaccinated to those who receive fewer or no vaccines."
It's a conspiracy, don't you know?
"Every day that government health officials lie to the people about vaccine risks is one more day that the public loses a little more trust in what they are told by government. .....MMR vaccine is known to induce brain inflammation and death within 8 to 14 days after vaccination......"
Don't you just love it when the safe-vaccine proponents put out the lying government charge. The government health officials probably ought to think about suing Fisher, right?
"Parents around the world are not fooled by the ignorant, inhumane behavior of forced vaccination proponents, whose zealous defense of one-size-fits-all vaccine policies injure and kill innocent children. The truth will shine bright and clear in the end."
Okay, so she's cast herself and those who follow her as the truth-shining martyrs and anyone who advocates for preventing disease as forced vaccination proponents and child killers. Ain't she a sweetheart?
"During the past 25 years of work to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education and defend the informed consent ethic, I have seen doctors who tell the truth about vaccine risks be viciously attacked by their colleagues in government, industry and academia. The attacks are both professional and personal and, with surgical precision, the goal is to evisicerate rather than simply stun the victim. It is an ugly process and it has a distinctly Spanish Inquisition flavor to it."
Flowery and poetic, huh? No hyperbole there at all. No exaggeration there at all.
Moving on to other whale.to pages with Fisher's writings:
"Reason and faith, conscience and science, truth and freedom. Those who participate in the Great Denial of vaccine risks cannot tolerate an unbiased, methodologically sound scientific investigation into those risks. And they cannot tolerate the free exercise of religious belief and conscience by those, whose minds and bodies they must control in order to perpetuate the Great Denial."
Now, we all know she's talking about scientists, but it could easily be turned back around. Study after study showing no link between vaccines and autism, but they're never good enough. No doctor denying, the government not denying, and certainly not the manufacturers denying that adverse reactions occur. We all admit it, we all admit there is an inherent risk. But that risk is less than the risk of the diseases themselves.
Fisher and people who believe as she does would have you take the risks of the diseases themselves.
I have written about Fisher before, deconstructing her H1N1 fact or fiction post and noting how chockful of nonsense it was.
Additional blogs on this:
More Than a Number
Orac, today 01/05/10
David Gorski at Science-Based Medicine
The Least Important Million-Dollar Question About Childhood Vaccinations